Results and Development

A ranking that shows
progress.

Lean Champions does not measure which company is the “best factory”. The ranking shows how well each participant is able to achieve its own goals, develop its projects and build on its results throughout the year. Below, you can follow the quarterly and annual results, as well as the way the evaluation is calculated.

01 Transparent criteria Each participant knows in advance how the result is calculated.
02 Competing with yourself The goal is progress compared with your own starting point.
03 Development throughout the year Each quarter is the next step, not a separate result.
Evaluation System

How is the result
calculated?

Participants do not compete against each other, but against their own goals and previous results. At the end of each quarter, the evaluation is based on three criteria.

01

5S

The participant selects an area that is audited at the beginning and at the end of the quarter.

When the predefined target is achieved, the participant receives 100%.
02

Kaizen Project

Each participant carries out an improvement project with a specific, measurable target – quality, productivity, SMED or another business indicator.

When the defined target is achieved, the result is 100%.
03

Participant Ranking

At the quarterly meeting, each team presents its project. The other participants rank it from 1st to 13th place, without being allowed to rank themselves.

1st place receives 12 points, 2nd place – 11 points, continuing down to 1 point.

The maximum result is 288 points, which is converted into a percentage.
Quarterly Score Arithmetic average of the three criteria: 5S + Kaizen + participant ranking.
Annual Score Arithmetic average of the results from Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4.
Selection of the Lean Champion
85% Annual score from the four quarters
15% Evaluation by the international jury
Differences in the 2025 Evaluation System

Voting among participants:
In 2025, participants gave scores from 1 to 6, without being allowed to vote for themselves. The resulting score was converted into a percentage and included in the final quarterly evaluation.

Final annual evaluation:
50% annual score + 50% evaluation from the annual ceremony, calculated as the average of the participant voting and the international jury evaluation.

🏅 Annual Ranking – 2025

Company Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Average (%)
Kostal Bulgaria Automotive Ltd. 🥇 94.9% 91.0% 90.4% 89.7% 91.5%
NIKI Ltd. 🥈 93.3% 87.0% 88.1% 86.6% 88.8%
APS Trading Ltd. 🥉 93.3% 87.0% 90.4% 83.8% 88.6%
TVH Bulgaria Ltd. 90.3% 87.0% 91.2% 84.9% 88.3%
Linamar Light Metals Ruse Ltd. 85.6% 91.0% 93.1% 82.1% 87.9%
Alcomet AD – Automotive Team 83.9% 89.0% 89.7% 87.4% 87.5%
Alcomet AD – Presses Team 85.7% 86.0% 85.7% 85.3% 85.7%
LEM Bulgaria Ltd. 91.1% 67.0% 90.4% 85.7% 83.6%

🏆 Lean Champion 2025 – Final Annual Result

Overall evaluation of the Q1–Q4 2025 performance, based on the annual average result, jury evaluation and participant voting.

Lean Champions Average Result Q1–Q4 2025
(50%)
Jury Evaluation
(25%)
Participant Voting
(25%)
Final Result
2025
NIKI Ltd. 🥇 44.38% 23.33% 16.07% 83.78%
Alcomet AD – Automotive Team 🥈 43.75% 22.50% 15.48% 81.72%
Kostal Bulgaria Automotive Ltd. 🥉 45.75% 20.42% 14.29% 80.45%
TVH Bulgaria Ltd. 44.17% 20.42% 14.29% 78.87%
Linamar Light Metals Ruse Ltd. 43.97% 22.08% 11.90% 77.96%
Alcomet AD – Presses Team 42.83% 20.83% 15.00% 78.67%
LEM Bulgaria Ltd. 41.78% 25.00% 11.31% 78.09%
APS Trading Ltd. 44.32% 20.42% 11.31% 76.04%

Evaluation: 50% annual average result • 25% jury evaluation • 25% participant voting

🏅 Participants' Award – 2025

Voting by the new 2026 participants (score from 1 to 3)

No. Lean Champions Individual Scores (1–3) Average
Score
1 Kostal Bulgaria Automotive Ltd. 🥇 3333 3332 2.88
2 NIKI Ltd. 🥈 3333 2332 2.75
3 Linamar Light Metals Ruse Ltd. 🥉 3232 2323 2.50
4 Alcomet AD – Automotive Team 2232 2223 2.25
5 APS Trading Ltd. 2222 2222 2.00
6 LEM Bulgaria Ltd. 2221 2222 1.88
7 TVH Bulgaria Ltd. 2113 2222 1.88
8 Alcomet AD – Presses Team 1111 1213 1.38

🗳️ The scores were given by the new participants joining Lean Champions in 2026.

📊 Q1 2025 Ranking – Lean Champions

No. Lean Champions 5S Kaizen Voting Final
Q1
Score
Audit 1 Audit 2 Target Score (%) KPI Before Q1 After Q1 Target Score (%) Rating Score (%)
1 Kostal Bulgaria Automotive Ltd. 94% 96% 96% 100% Efficiency 89.7% 99.8% 99.8% 100% 5.2 84.6% 94.9% 🥇
2 APS Trading Ltd. 25% 81% 45% 100% Man-hours per unit of production 0.57 0.35 0.51 100% 5.0 80.0% 93.3% 🥈
3 NIKI Ltd. 23% 68% 60% 100% AM plan completion 0.0% 37.0% 37.0% 100% 5.0 80.0% 93.3% 🥈
4 LEM Bulgaria Ltd. 88% 92% 92% 100% AM plan completion 0.0% 20.0% 20.0% 100% 4.7 73.3% 91.1% 🥉
5 TVH Bulgaria Ltd. 9% 61% 45% 100% Average monthly production 8729 9997 9200 100% 4.5 70.8% 90.3%
6 Alcomet AD – Presses Team 22% 43% 45% 96% Yield 58% 65% 65% 100% 4.1 61.4% 85.7%
7 Linamar Light Metals Ruse Ltd. 68% 86% 80% 100% FA 7 Efficiency 40.0% 53.0% 52.0% 100% 3.8 56.7% 85.6%
8 Alcomet AD – Automotive Team 9% 38% 45% 84% Occupied pallets 182 96 98 98% 4.5 69.2% 83.9%

Color indicator: 🟢 above 90% | 🟡 80–90% | 🔴 below 80%

📊 Q2 2025 Ranking – Lean Champions

No. Lean Champions 5S Kaizen Voting Final
Q2
Score
Audit 1 Audit 2 Target Score (%) KPI Before
Q2
After Q2 Target Score (%) Rating Score (%)
1 Kostal Bulgaria Automotive Ltd. 98% 98% 98% 100% Scrap rate 3.0% 0.5% 0.5% 100% 2.18 73% 91% 🥇
2 Linamar Light Metals Ruse Ltd. 70% 85% 80% 100% Efficiency – Core Shop Department 47.0% 50.0% 48.0% 100% 2.18 73% 91% 🥇
3 Alcomet AD – Automotive Team 25% 90% 75% 100% AM plan completion (%) 0 8% 8% 100% 2.0 67% 89% 🥈
4 TVH Bulgaria Ltd. 27% 97% 60% 100% Production lead time reduction (days) 29 24 24 100% 1.82 61% 87% 🥉
5 NIKI Ltd. 57% 94% 97% 97% AM plan completion 37.0% 57.0% 57.0% 100% 1.91 64% 87% 🥉
6 APS Trading Ltd. 31% 89% 70% 100% Material preparation time reduction (min.) 246 74 20% 100% 1.82 61% 87% 🥉
7 Alcomet AD – Presses Team 43% 88% 90% 98% AM implementation in 3 areas (%) 0 3 3 100% 1.83 61% 86%
8 LEM Bulgaria Ltd. 30% 73% 70% 100% AM plan completion 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 100% 0.0 0% 67%

Color indicator: 🟢 above 90% | 🟡 80–90% | 🔴 below 80%

📊 Q3 2025 Ranking – Lean Champions

No. Lean Champions 5S Kaizen Voting Final
Q3
Score
Audit 1 Audit 2 Target Score (%) KPI Before
Q3
After Q3 Target Score (%) Rating Score (%)
1 Linamar Light Metals Ruse Ltd. 72% 82% 80% 100% Efficiency – Core Shop Department 50.0% 49.0% 51.0% 96% 2.50 83% 93.1% 🥇
2 TVH Bulgaria Ltd. 50% 97% 80% 100% Productivity – average number of cylinders produced per month 45 53 50 100% 2.21 74% 91.2% 🥈
3 Kostal Bulgaria Automotive Ltd. 98% 98% 98% 100% Reduce monthly warehousing costs by 15% € 270,000 € 229,500 € 229,500 100% 2.14 71% 90.4% 🥉
3 APS Trading Ltd. 44% 93% 75% 100% Improve the efficiency of the TPH line 37.50% 26.70% 30% 100% 2.14 71% 90.4% 🥉
3 LEM Bulgaria Ltd. 95% 95% 95% 100% AM plan completion 17.0% 37.0% 37.0% 100% 2.14 71% 90.4% 🥉
4 Alcomet AD – Automotive Team 25% 90% 75% 100% AM plan completion (%) 8 24% 24% 100% 2.07 69% 89.7%
5 NIKI Ltd. 53% 85% 80% 100% AM plan completion 57.0% 69.0% 69.0% 100% 1.93 64% 88.1%
6 Alcomet AD – Presses Team 43% 88% 80% 100% AM implementation in 5 areas (%) 3 8 5 100% 1.71 57% 85.7%

Color indicator: 🟢 above 90% | 🟡 80–90% | 🔴 below 80%

📊 Q4 2025 Ranking – Lean Champions

No. Lean Champions 5S Kaizen Voting Final
Q4
Score
Audit 1 Audit 2 Target Score (%) KPI Before
Q4
After Q4 Target Score (%) Rating Score (%)
1 Kostal Bulgaria Automotive Ltd. 98% 98% 98% 100% FTE optimization in the raw material supply process 3 0 0 100% 2.07 69% 89.7% 🥇
2 Alcomet AD – Automotive Team 25% 87% 85% 100% AM plan completion (%) 24 64% 64% 100% 1.87 62% 87.4% 🥈
3 NIKI Ltd. 53% 90% 80% 100% AM plan completion 69.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 1.79 60% 86.6% 🥉
4 LEM Bulgaria Ltd. 42% 87% 85% 100% Production floor space savings (m²) 210 m² 194 m² 194 m² 100% 1.71 57% 85.7%
5 Alcomet AD – Presses Team 43% 79% 80% 99% AM implementation in 5 areas (%) 8 11 11 100% 1.71 57% 85.3%
6 TVH Bulgaria Ltd. 32% 95% 80% 100% Future cost avoidance € 50,000 € 62,000 € 50,000 100% 1.64 55% 84.9%
7 APS Trading Ltd. 67% 92% 88% 100% Increase productivity per shift 625 724 724 100% 1.54 51% 83.8%
8 Linamar Light Metals Ruse Ltd. 60% 79% 80% 99% Efficiency – Core Shop Department 49.0% 55.0% 55.0% 100% 1.43 48% 82.1%

Color indicator: 🟢 above 90% | 🟡 80–90% | 🔴 below 80%

🏅 Annual Ranking – 2026

Place Company Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Average (%)
1 Ottobock Manufacturing Bulgaria Ltd. 🥇 88.89% 95.14% 92.02%
2 Mebel Stil Ltd. 🥈 88.77% 89.00% 88.88%
3 TVH Bulgaria Ltd. 🥉 86.69% 90.74% 88.72%
4 LEM Bulgaria Ltd. 83.80% 90.28% 87.04%
5 Südwolle Group Italy – Bulsafil 85.88% 82.99% 84.44%
6 APS Trading Ltd. 82.75% 84.72% 83.73%
7 Kostal Bulgaria Automotive Ltd. 83.33% 83.33% 83.33%
8 Linamar Light Metals Ruse Ltd. 81.21% 84.26% 82.73%
9 AQ Plastronik AD 82.52% 82.75% 82.63%
10 Alcomet AD 81.60% 81.94% 81.77%
11 Wegmann Automotive Bulgaria Ltd. 81.37% 79.86% 80.62%
12 Jacobs Douwe Egberts BG Ltd. 83.24% 77.31% 80.28%
13 NIKI Ltd. 81.38% 76.87% 79.12%

📊 Q1 2026 Ranking – Lean Champions

No. Lean Champions 5S Kaizen Participant Ranking Final
Result
Q1 2026
Audit 1 Audit 2 Target Result (%) KPI Before Q1 After Q1 Target Result (%) Ranking Points Result as % of 288 max. points
1 Ottobock Manufacturing Bulgaria Ltd. 57% 78% 70% 100% Weekly productivity (units per person) 10.5 12.5 11.5 100% 192.00 66.67% 88.89% 🥇
2 Mebel Stil Ltd. 38% 78% 70% 100% Productivity – time per set (sec.) 114 89 90 100% 191.00 66.32% 88.77% 🥈
3 TVH Bulgaria Ltd. 72% 93% 85% 100% Cost optimization – AC motors (%) 47.0% 19.1% 25.0% 100% 173.00 60.07% 86.69% 🥉
4 Südwolle Group Italy – Bulsafil 52% 80% 75% 100% Setup time reduction (min.) 60 23 30 100% 166.00 57.64% 85.88%
5 LEM Bulgaria Ltd. 87% 96% 90% 100% Finished goods warehouse efficiency (average time in sec. per export list row) 330 300 300 100% 148.00 51.39% 83.80%
6 Kostal Bulgaria Automotive Ltd. 27% 88% 60% 100% Autonomous Maintenance plan completion (%) 0% 5% 5% 100% 144.00 50.00% 83.33%
7 Jacobs Douwe Egberts BG Ltd. 51% 80% 85% 94.12% Global efficiency % (Roastery) 66.0% 67.8% 68.0% 99.7% 161.00 55.90% 83.24%
8 APS Trading Ltd. 96% --- 95% 100% Supplier delivery lead time optimization (days) 65 14 20 100% 139.00 48.26% 82.75%
9 AQ Plastronik AD 53% 92% 80% 100% Productivity increase (products per operator) 120 150 138 (15%) 100% 137.00 47.57% 82.52%
10 Alcomet AD 19% 52% 50% 100% Setup time reduction (hours) 06:15 02:15 03:00 100% 129.00 44.79% 81.60%
11 Wegmann Automotive Bulgaria Ltd. 34% 60% 55% 100% Increase in lead casting production capacity (number of castings) 5952 7438 7400 100% 127.00 44.10% 81.37%
12 NIKI Ltd. 0% 38% 40% 93.75% Annual improvement plan completion 0.0% 40.7% 41.7% 97.60% 152.00 52.78% 81.38%
13 Linamar Light Metals Ruse Ltd. 82% --- 80% 100% Quality improvement (%) 27.0% 25.9% 22.0% 84.94% 169.00 58.68% 81.21%

Color indicator: 🟢 above 90% | 🟡 80–90% | 🔴 below 80%

📊 Q2 2026 Ranking – Lean Champions

No. Lean Champions 5S Kaizen Participant Ranking Final
Result
Q2 2026
Audit 1 Audit 2 Target Result (%) KPI Before Q2 After Q2 Target Result (%) Ranking Points Result as % of 288 max. points
1 Ottobock Manufacturing Bulgaria Ltd. 39% 73% 65% 100% Weekly productivity – units 35.0 80.0 70.0 100% 246 85.42% 95.14% 🥇
2 TVH Bulgaria Ltd. 91% 92.5% 92.5% 100% DC motor quality improvement (%) 60.0% 24.2% 25.0% 100% 208 72.22% 90.74% 🥈
3 LEM Bulgaria Ltd. 93% --- 90% 100% DMS management cost optimization 0 800 800 100% 204 70.83% 90.28% 🥉
4 Mebel Stil Ltd. – Plant 1 18% 87% 55% 100% Foam quantity optimization 1643 m³ 1360 m³ 1360 m³ 100% 193 67.01% 89.00%
5 APS Trading Ltd. 18% 83% 75% 100% Order processing time optimization – Bravo Store (min.) 07:24 04:50 05:00 100% 156 54.17% 84.72%
6 Linamar Light Metals Ruse Ltd. 53% 82% 80% 100% Quality improvement (%) 24.7% 20.0% 20.0% 100.00% 152 52.78% 84.26%
7 Kostal Bulgaria Automotive Ltd. 25% 60% 50% 100% Autonomous Maintenance plan completion (%) 5% 20% 20% 100% 144 50.00% 83.33%
8 Südwolle Group Italy – Bulsafil 52% 75% 75% 100% Setup time reduction (min.) 42 23 30 100% 141 48.96% 82.99%
9 AQ Plastronik AD 64% 80% 75% 100% Productivity increase (%) 36% 87% 60% 100% 139 48.26% 82.75%
10 Alcomet AD 52% 65% 60% 100% Setup time reduction (hours) 06:39 02:27 03:30 100% 132 45.83% 81.94%
11 Wegmann Automotive Bulgaria Ltd. 77% 86% 80% 100% Autonomous Maintenance plan completion (%) 0% 18.2% 11% 100% 114 39.58% 79.86%
12 Jacobs Douwe Egberts BG Ltd. 77% 91% 85% 100% Global efficiency % (Roastery) 68.0% 70.1% 70.0% 100% 92 31.94% 77.31%
13 NIKI Ltd. 38% 40% 40% 100% Annual improvement plan completion 40.7% 87.0% 93.1% 93.45% 107 37.15% 76.87%

Color indicator: 🟢 above 90% | 🟡 80–90% | 🔴 below 80%